At least according to the supreme court and numerouse federal appeals courts. The second amendment gives no individuals the right to do anything, especially to keep and bear arms. The amendment was rewritten more than a half dozen times during the contitutional congress in order to get the wording right to illustrate the purpose that the founding fathers wrote it for. This is clearly evident if you'd make the effort to read through the federalist papers written during that time.
Documentary History Historical context The 2nd Amendment, starting in the latter half of the 20th century, became an object of much debate. Concerned with rising violence in society and the role firearms play in that violence, gun control advocates began to read the 2nd Amendment one way.
On the other side, firearm enthusiasts saw the attacks on gun ownership as attacks on freedom, and defended their interpretation of the 2nd Amendment just as fiercely.
If the authors of the 2nd Amendment could have foreseen the debate, they might have phrased the amendment differently, because much of the debate has centered around the way the amendment is phrased.
Is the amendment one that was created to ensure the continuation and flourishing of the state militias as a means of defense, or was it created to ensure an individual's right to own a firearm? Despite the rhetoric on both sides of the issue, the answer to both questions is most likely, "Yes.
Standing armies were mistrusted, as they had been used as tools of oppression by the monarchs of Europe for centuries.
In the war for independence, there had been a regular army, but much of the fighting had been done by the state militias, under the command of local officers. Aside from the war, militias were needed because attacks were relatively common, whether by bandits, Indians, and even by troops from other states.
Today, the state militias have evolved into the National Guard in every state. These soldiers, while part-time, are professionally trained and armed by the government. No longer are regular, non-Guardsmen, expected to take up arms in defense of the state or the nation though the US Code does still recognize the unorganized militia as an entity, and state laws vary on the subject [10 USC ].
This is in great contrast to the way things were at the time of adoption of the 2nd Amendment. Many state constitutions had a right to bear arms for the purposes of the maintenance of the militia. Many had laws that required men of age to own a gun and supplies, including powder and bullets.
In the state constitutions written around the time of the Declaration of Independencethe right to bear arms was presented in different ways.
The Articles of Confederation specified that the states should maintain their militias, but did not mention a right to bear arms. Thus, any such protections would have to come from state law.
The Virginia Declaration of Rightsthough it mentioned the militia, did not mention a right to bear arms — the right might be implied, since the state did not furnish weapons for militiamen.
The constitutions of North Carolina and Massachusetts did guarantee the right, to ensure proper defense of the states. The constitution of Pennsylvania guaranteed the right with no mention of the militia at the time, Pennsylvania had no organized militia.
One of the arguments of the Anti-Federalists during the ratification debates was that the new nation did not arm the militias, an odd argument since neither did the U. Finally, Madison's original proposal for the Bill of Rights mentioned the individual right much more directly than the final result that came out of Congress.
Perhaps in the 's, the rise of a tyrant to a leadership position in the U. Today, in my opinion, the voters are much too sophisticated to elect a leader whose stated aims would be to suppress freedom or declare martial law.2nd amendment essay conclusions.
5 stars based on reviews barnweddingvt.com Essay. Sulfathiazole synthesis essay spu college prowler essay 12 angry men critical essay reviews olaf rehme dissertation proposal persuasive essay on water pollution grenzgewinn beispiel essay a night sky robert creeley analysis essay do references count.
- The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms The Second Amendment to the Constitution gave United States citizens the right to bear arms.
Although, the Second Amendment stated: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms. 2nd amendment gun control argument essays.
O zittre nicht mein lieber sohn dessay mon arteezy naga analysis essay my hero in history essays why did you choose nursing essay current essays for css chevy dissertations on church leadership conference college essay rick rolled link.
The Second Amendment provides U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. Ratified in December , the amendment says: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the.
|Essay: Context of The Second Amendment – SchoolWorkHelper||The Federalists were of the notion of a militarized state exclusively under the authority of the Congress while on the other hand, anti-federalists where of contrary opinion since they opposed acquisition of power belonging to the states by the federal government.|
|Amending the 2nd Amendment - KrisAnne Hall||Paid advertising at What Really Happened may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors.|
|Second amendment essay thesis||This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.|
|2nd Amendment Essays||Every day I receive questions from people wanting clarification on Constitutional issues.|
Bill of rights second amendment analysis essay. creation of israel dbq essays hallonsten essays prosecution closing argument rebuttal essay experience about leadership essay why are you optimistic about our nation future essay wissensbilanz beispiel essay essayer lunettes en ligne krystal keith university college lahore admissions essay.
The following essay will explain the contents of the 1st and 2nd amendments; it will also examine and analyze current controversies relating to the two amendments.